Federal E-rate Program Fraud Scheme

Published Thu, 2008-04-24 14:44 Internet

Co-owners of a New Jersey-based computer service provider have agreed to plead guilty to participating in a conspiracy to defraud the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) E-Rate program, the Department of Justice announced today.

Conspiracy charges were filed in the U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Kan., against Benjamin Rowner and Jay H. Soled, former owners of DeltaNet Inc., for their role in defrauding the E-Rate program. Rowner and Soled conspired to defraud the E-Rate program by submitting false statements and concealing material facts from the Universal Service Administrative Company, which administers the E-Rate Program for the FCC. In some instances, these false statements were submitted by wire transmission, email and U.S. mail. The conspiracy began in 1999 and ran at least until 2003, affecting schools from New York to California. Under the terms of their plea agreements, which are subject to court approval, the two men have agreed to cooperate with the Department’s ongoing investigation.

E-Rate, a program authorized by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, provides funding to economically disadvantaged school districts and libraries to connect to and utilize the Internet. Under the E-Rate program, schools can receive money for cabling, Internet backbone equipment (i.e., servers, PBX and switches), and the reimbursement of monthly Internet and telephone connectivity service fees.

As a result of the Antitrust Division’s investigation into fraud and anticompetitive conduct in the E-Rate Program, a total of six companies and 12 individuals have pleaded guilty, have been convicted and found guilty, or entered civil settlements and have paid, agreed to pay, or been sentenced to pay, criminal fines and restitution totaling more than $40 million. Trials are currently pending in three additional E-Rate cases, and one individual remains an international fugitive.

The conspiracy charges each carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine for individuals. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either amount is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

The charges announced resulted from an ongoing investigation by the Antitrust Division, the FBI, the FCC concerning fraud committed on the E-Rate program and with assistance from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Kansas. Anyone with information concerning violations of the E-Rate Program or other anticompetitive conduct is urged to call the Chicago Field Office of the Antitrust Division at 312-353-7530.

Defrauding The E-Rate Program, Conviction The fraud schemes and bid-rigging conspiracies involved more than 25 school projects located throughout the seven states during the 1998 to 2003 time period.

Post new comment

* Internet
* Software
* Linux
* Computers/Servers
* Memory
* RFID
* Video Cards
* NanoTechnology
* Mobile

* Space
* Military
* Energy
* Spam
* Corporate Finance
* Acquisitions and Mergers
* CPU
* Embedded
* Automotive Tech

Man Involved In Online Piracy Sentenced SCOTT CARRERA, 33, of Darien, Illinois, has been sentenced by Chief United States District Judge Robert N. Chatigny in Hartford to three years of probation, the first six months of which CARRERA must spend in home confinement. Judge Chatigny also ordered CARRERA to pay a fine in the amount of $7500 and to perform 120 hours of community service. On May 7, 2007, CARRERA pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. This matter stems from a multinational software piracy investigation known as “Operation Higher Education.”
Guilty Plea, Steroids Over The Internet COREY L. STANFORD, JR., 31, of Austin, Texas, pleaded guilty before United States District Judge Janet C. Hall in Bridgeport to one count of distributing anabolic steroids. According to documents filed with the Court and statements made in court, STANFORD used the Internet, including the website sell.com, to communicate with individuals interested in buying steroids. STANFORD then sent the steroids to those individuals through the mail.
2007-2008 eCYBERMISSION Competition Sixteen student teams from throughout the United States are first place regional winners in the 2007-2008 eCYBERMISSION competition. With this award, each team member will receive a $3,000 U.S. EE savings bond and will be invited to Washington, D.C., in June to compete in this year's National Judging and Educational Event.
Botnet Herder Acidstorm Pleads Guilty In the first prosecution of its kind in the nation, a man who is well known to members of the “ botnet underground” pleaded guilty to federal charges related to his use of “ botnets” – armies of compromised computers – to steal the identities of victims throughout the country by extracting information from their personal computers and wiretapping their communications. John Schiefer, 26, of Los Angeles (90011), appeared before United States District Judge A. Howard Matz and pleaded guilty to accessing protected computers to conduct fraud, disclosing illegally intercepted electronic communications, wire fraud and bank fraud.
Diet Supplement Case, $120 Million To Be Paid The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has upheld a district court ruling requiring marketers of Seasilver, an alleged phony cure-all, to pay almost $120 million for failing to comply with an earlier order requiring them to pay $3 million in consumer redress. The decision, issued on April 10, 2008, affirmed a district court order requiring Jason and Bela Berkes, Seasilver, USA, Inc., and Americaloe, Inc., to pay almost $120 million under an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission. The March 2004 order barred them from making false or misleading claims and included a $120 million judgment that would be suspended if they paid $3 million within a specified time. The defendants did not meet the required payment terms, and in June 2006 a district court granted the Commission’s request to enforce the stipulated judgment. The defendants appealed the decision.